The original Section 218 () Agreement for the State of Florida and the Social Security Administration came into effect on January 1, 1956. Since then, Florida has made more than 650 changes to the original 218 agreement on behalf of pension plans or public employers. The changes were made for a variety of reasons, for example. B to include additional coverage groups, to identify political subdivisions that join a pension plan already covered by the agreement to report covered subdivisions that have dissolved or restructured, to obtain Medicare-Only coverage for certain employees of the pension plan, or to correct errors in other amendments. services provided by election officers and election officers who have been paid for the calendar year below the legal threshold; unless the agreement provided for in Division 218 applies to election officers. A section 218 agreement may be concluded retroactively for up to five years of insurance from the date of approval of the agreement by the Confederation. It takes about six months to get approval from the Confederation. For example, if a retroactivity request is filed in 2017 and approved in 2018, the coverage could be applied retroactively to the 2013 coverage year. In retroactive situations of modification that do not involve an error modification, the applicable date may not be earlier than the date on which the agreement or modification is sent or notified to SSA (and was designated by the State in the text of the agreement or amendment), or at the latest the date on which SSA executes such agreement or modification. As a general rule, only employees who are members of the coverage group and who have an employment relationship with the covered company on the date that controls the retroactive coverage (applicable date) are covered for a retroactive insurance period. Such a worker would be insured as follows: in 1991, social security became compulsory for employees of public and local government, unless they are members of a qualified public pension scheme (sometimes referred to as a “social security replacement plan” or “replacement plan”) or are covered by an agreement under section 218. In other words, a local government employee who does not have a Section 218 agreement must be covered by Social Security unless the employee participates in a replacement plan. This suddenly became so important because California`s Social Security Administrator recently began asking all governments and locals if they have a Section 218 agreement, if they participate in Social Security, and if they present a replacement plan.
We think they might be shocked to know how many public institutions have been overtaken by their own “generosity.” Stay on the spot. A public body may determine whether it has an agreement by directing itself to the State Social Security Administrator. . . .