Children have sometimes been described as “inexperience[d] with a consensual reality although they are described as such, expecting their perspective to gradually approach the consensual reality of their society. Let us take this example: the reality of consensus for people following a certain thecroque religion is different from the consensual reality for those who follow another thecroic religion, or those who avoid thecroic religions in favour of science alone to explain life and the universe. Talking to your friends or your shrinking will only be helpful if they are brave enough to offer a different perspective. An agreement will confirm your position and keep you in mind. You`re dead in your head. I also have another tool that I use regularly, which may seem simple and is a gem. I write the name of the person or organization on a sheet of paper after meditating or praying and putting it in my “God box.” It`s an action if you`re not ready to take action. My box of God is a little box that I hold on a table in my room. The idea is that anything you believe outside of yourself (God, nature, whatever) will give you a guide when the time is right, compared to the name you place in it. It works because it gets the name out to me as soon as I put the word in the box. Materialists may not accept the idea that there are different realities for different people rather than different beliefs about a reality.
For them, only the first use of the notion of reality would make sense. For them, someone who believes something else, where the facts were properly established, could be considered delusional. [Citation required] Have you ever spent hours talking about something that bothers you? Do you call friends or family to ventilate? Do you think a solution and relief will appear if you excite it over and over again? How much time do you spend in the reality of the agreement “The reality of the agreement is acquired because others tell you that it is so.” If one considers the nature of reality, there are two general approaches: the realistic approach, in which there is a unique, objective, general reality, which one thinks exists independently of the perception of a particular individual, and the idealistic approach in which one assumes that an individual can verify nothing other than his own experience of the world and can never know directly the truth of the world independently of that. We live in a world of agreement reality, it happens all the time around us. People who disagree with prevailing opinions often remain calm because of the spiral of silence. The reason for this theory, developed by the German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, is that if one opposes a well-received social agreement, one risks being thrown out of the campfire and eaten by wolves. In societies where theoretic religions predominate, religious understanding of existence would be the reality of consensus, while religious belief would remain the non-consensual (or alternative) reality in a predominantly secular society, where consensual reality is based solely on science.